QITE and QRTE¶
Imaginary-time evolution suppresses high-energy components, while real-time evolution tracks dynamics of a prepared state.
The VarQITE implementation approximates (1) through a projected variational update.
VarQRTE solves the projected linear system in (2) to advance parameters in real time.
Imaginary-time evolution:
Suppresses higher-energy components.
VarQITE approximates evolution using McLachlan projection.
VarQRTE uses the same projected-variational machinery, but for real-time unitary dynamics rather than imaginary-time relaxation.
Practical distinction in this repository:
VQE/VarQITEare state-finding workflowsQPEis a spectral / phase-estimation workflowVarQRTEis a dynamics workflow used after a relevant state has already been prepared
For a time-independent Hamiltonian, real-time evolution should conserve energy up to numerical error. For that reason, the most useful VarQRTE diagnostics are usually:
time-dependent observables
fidelity to exact evolution on small systems
overlap with the initial state
trajectory error over time
Quantum Real Time Evolution¶
VarQRTE in this repository is a McLachlan-projected real-time evolution method on a variational state manifold.
Conceptually:
start from a prepared state \(|\psi(\theta_0)\rangle\)
project Schrödinger evolution onto the ansatz tangent space
solve a linear system for parameter velocities
integrate the parameter trajectory forward in time
Unlike VarQITE, VarQRTE does not try to suppress excited-state components or minimize the energy. Its role is to approximate the time evolution of a chosen initial state under a fixed Hamiltonian.
That means a good correctness question for VarQRTE is:
how well does the variational trajectory track exact real-time evolution of the same initial state?
not:
how low is the final energy?
Linear system:
with:
Update:
Implementation features:
noiseless parameter updates
regularized linear solvers
noise applied only during evaluation